Multi Pass PR Review Director
For senior reviewers who want one prompt to inspect correctness, security, performance, and tests in separate passes.
Best for these models
๐ The Prompt
๐ Prompt available in download
Get the full prompt text in a downloadable .txt file. Free, no signup required.
Download PromptVariables to fill in
{{CODE_DIFF}} โ Replace with your input {{LANGUAGE}} โ Replace with your input {{REVIEW_ORDER}} โ Replace with your input {{TEAM_RULES}} โ Replace with your input {{TARGET_ENV}} โ Replace with your input About this prompt
Multi Pass PR Review Director is a comprehensive prompt for teams that want one review workflow to cover correctness, security, performance, and test quality. Instead of asking the model to do everything in a single pass, it guides the model through separate evaluation stages so each concern gets focused attention. This reduces shallow feedback and makes the final review more reliable for complex pull requests.
This template is ideal for staff engineers, code reviewers, and team leads who need a full-spectrum review before merge. It is useful when a PR touches multiple risk areas and you do not want security comments to crowd out test gaps or performance regressions. The output is organized so authors can fix the most important problems first, then follow with improvements. It works well for large PRs, cross-cutting changes, and release candidates that need extra scrutiny.
Customize by pasting {{CODE_DIFF}}, specifying {{LANGUAGE}}, and setting the review emphasis in {{REVIEW_ORDER}}. Add your team standards in {{TEAM_RULES}} and the target deployment in {{TARGET_ENV}}. The prompt returns a staged review with findings from each pass and a final verdict. For best results, use it when you need a consistent review format across multiple teams or when a single reviewer is expected to cover several disciplines at once.
Key features
- Runs separate passes for correctness, security, performance, and tests.
- Reduces shallow feedback on complex cross-cutting changes.
- Produces a final combined verdict with top fixes.
- Ideal for full-spectrum review workflows.
- Customizable review order matches team priorities.
Best for
- โ Staff engineers reviewing large PRs
- โ Team leads standardizing multi-discipline reviews
- โ Senior reviewers handling release-candidate changes
Tips
- ๐ก Set {{REVIEW_ORDER}} to prioritize your highest-risk areas first.
- ๐ก Add concise team rules in {{TEAM_RULES}} to keep the output aligned with local conventions.
- ๐ก Use smaller diffs with this prompt to keep each pass precise and actionable.
What you'll get
A staged review with four labeled passes and a final summary. Each pass surfaces the most relevant findings for that discipline, then the final section consolidates the top fixes into a single action list. The result is easier to share with authors because it separates critical issues from nice-to-have improvements.
Preparing your download...
Download PromptRelated prompts
API Contract Review Analyst
For engineers reviewing API changes that may break clients, contracts, or backward compatibility guarantees.
API Mock Server Blueprinter
For teams building mock services that simulate realistic API behavior before backend completion.
API Reference Documentation Forge
For platform teams generating accurate API reference docs from schemas, routes, or endpoint notes.
Backend Test Fixture Architect
For senior engineers creating reusable fixtures and mocks for complex backend test suites.