Security First Pull Request Auditor
For security-minded engineers reviewing PRs that touch authentication, authorization, or sensitive data flows.
Best for these models
๐ The Prompt
๐ Prompt available in download
Get the full prompt text in a downloadable .txt file. Free, no signup required.
Download PromptVariables to fill in
{{CODE_DIFF}} โ Replace with your input {{LANGUAGE}} โ Replace with your input {{SECURITY_RULES}} โ Replace with your input {{FOCUS_AREAS}} โ Replace with your input About this prompt
Security First Pull Request Auditor turns ChatGPT or Claude into a meticulous reviewer that looks for security vulnerabilities before code reaches production. It evaluates authentication, authorization, secrets handling, input validation, dependency risk, and unsafe assumptions. The template is designed to produce actionable feedback with clear severity labels, so teams can separate blockers from lower-priority concerns without losing context.
This prompt is ideal for platform engineers, application security reviewers, and senior developers working in environments where mistakes can expose customer data or violate compliance requirements. It helps you inspect diffs for broken access control, injection risks, insecure defaults, and missing safeguards. The output is structured enough to support fast triage, but detailed enough to guide authors toward a safe fix. Use it when you need a thorough code review without manually scanning every line.
Customize the template by pasting your diff into {{CODE_DIFF}}, specifying the language in {{LANGUAGE}}, and adding your org rules in {{SECURITY_RULES}}. If you want broader coverage, set {{FOCUS_AREAS}} to include secrets, supply chain, or data privacy. The prompt returns a concise review with findings, impact, and recommended remediation steps. For best results, pair it with a second pass focused on performance or tests so you get a complete release readiness check.
Key features
- Security triage separates blockers from lower-risk concerns.
- Checks auth flows, secrets handling, and input validation.
- Produces remediation steps with clear risk explanations.
- Supports production code in regulated environments.
- Structured verdict helps teams decide merge readiness fast.
Best for
- โ Application security engineers reviewing sensitive changes
- โ Senior backend developers auditing auth and access-control code
- โ Tech leads shipping compliance-sensitive features
Tips
- ๐ก Add your internal secure-coding rules to {{SECURITY_RULES}} for fewer false positives.
- ๐ก Use {{FOCUS_AREAS}} to prioritize auth, secrets, or data privacy checks.
- ๐ก Paste only the changed files when you want faster, more targeted analysis.
What you'll get
A structured security review with three sections. It lists blockers such as broken authorization, warns about risky patterns like weak validation, and ends with a verdict. Each finding includes the affected file or snippet, why it matters, and a suggested fix. The output is concise enough for PR comments, but detailed enough for security sign-off.
Preparing your download...
Download PromptRelated prompts
API Contract Review Analyst
For engineers reviewing API changes that may break clients, contracts, or backward compatibility guarantees.
API Mock Server Blueprinter
For teams building mock services that simulate realistic API behavior before backend completion.
API Reference Documentation Forge
For platform teams generating accurate API reference docs from schemas, routes, or endpoint notes.
Backend Test Fixture Architect
For senior engineers creating reusable fixtures and mocks for complex backend test suites.